Stage 2 RMM for Mazdaspeed!

Discussion in 'Corksport' started by Barett@CorkSport, Apr 5, 2017.

Watchers:
20 users.
  1. Redline

    Redline I done fucked up for the last time. BANNED Greenie Member

    Joined:
    Feb 12, 2016
    Posts:
    2,706
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    Bannedville
    Ratings:
    +1,143 / -66
    Yet another satisfied Damond mounts customer. I really can't recommend them highly enough :D
     
    • Like Like x 1
  2. MrMS3

    MrMS3 Greenie N00B Member

    Joined:
    May 17, 2017
    Posts:
    5
    Trophy Points:
    3
    Location:
    Florida
    Ratings:
    +7 / -0
    Nice! Can't wait to get there as well!


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
     
    MrMS3, via a mobile device, May 17, 2017
    #62
    • Like Like x 3
  3. modusoperandi

    modusoperandi Silver Member

    Joined:
    May 19, 2017
    Posts:
    132
    Trophy Points:
    28
    Location:
    SFV, CA
    Ratings:
    +73 / -0
    Highly considering on purchasing one despite just having purchased a RMM from Matt Damond.
     
  4. Littleloogy

    Littleloogy Recovering Speed Addict Platinum Member

    Joined:
    Feb 10, 2016
    Posts:
    401
    Trophy Points:
    63
    Location:
    Ripon, CA
    Ratings:
    +481 / -0
    I say purchase it and make an unbiased comparison of the two. I'm sure many would be interested in the pros and cons of both products.


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro
     
    Littleloogy, via a mobile device, May 19, 2017
    #64
    • Like Like x 2
  5. modusoperandi

    modusoperandi Silver Member

    Joined:
    May 19, 2017
    Posts:
    132
    Trophy Points:
    28
    Location:
    SFV, CA
    Ratings:
    +73 / -0
    Most definitely I am just waiting to get my check to put some cash towards the mount to see if it works better than the Matt Damond one.

    Sent from my Nexus 6 using Tapatalk
     
    modusoperandi, via a mobile device, May 20, 2017
    #65
    • Like Like x 2
  6. UnknownReagent

    UnknownReagent Greenie Member

    Joined:
    May 8, 2017
    Posts:
    10
    Trophy Points:
    3
    Location:
    Louisville, KY
    Ratings:
    +9 / -0
    I have all 3 Damond mounts and I love them but I think the new CS RMM could potentially be better due to the geometry. I'm really eager to see a back to back comparison of the 2.
     
    • Like Like x 3
  7. UnknownReagent

    UnknownReagent Greenie Member

    Joined:
    May 8, 2017
    Posts:
    10
    Trophy Points:
    3
    Location:
    Louisville, KY
    Ratings:
    +9 / -0
    Any followup on this?
     
  8. VTMongoose

    VTMongoose John/MD1032 Platinum Member

    Joined:
    Feb 10, 2016
    Posts:
    381
    Trophy Points:
    63
    Location:
    North Brunswick, NJ
    Ratings:
    +391 / -1
    Send me one and I'll tell you the difference between the Damond and the CS with a built motor ;)
     
    • Like Like x 1
  9. Redline

    Redline I done fucked up for the last time. BANNED Greenie Member

    Joined:
    Feb 12, 2016
    Posts:
    2,706
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    Bannedville
    Ratings:
    +1,143 / -66
    Just a clarifying question: do you mean "better" in terms of performance, NVH, or both? Personally, better for me would be performance prioritized first, but if it could do that and have lower NVH too, that'd be awesome, though the DM RMM isn't that bad at all compared to previous RMMs I've had.
     
  10. UnknownReagent

    UnknownReagent Greenie Member

    Joined:
    May 8, 2017
    Posts:
    10
    Trophy Points:
    3
    Location:
    Louisville, KY
    Ratings:
    +9 / -0
    Based on the force vectors in the CS RMM, I think it's possible you'd see reduced engine movement with reduced/same NVH. Both are important to me since my car is a DD and it's already pretty loud but I also hate drivetrain slop and crappy shift-feel.

    That said, it might also be the case that there isn't any perceptible improvement to be made over the Damond RMM.
     
    • Like Like x 1
Loading...

Share This Page

Users Viewing Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 0)